“Teri maa ki…”

January 12, 2008

Reports in some Indian nespapers state that Harbhajan may have said “Teri maa ki…” to Symonds, who heard it as “monkey” and got all hot and bothered. If this is indeed true (i.e. Bhajji did say “teri maa ki…”), it explains why Bhajji and Tendulkar have been so confident that what Harbhajan said was not a racial slur. I suppose “teri maa ki…” is as widely used in India as “bastards” is used in Australia (this word, by the way, is supposed to have been used by Brad Hogg in his “banter” with Kumble and Dhoni at Sydney). And I was told by a friend (who claims to have read it somewhere) that Symonds apparently called Bhajji a “f#$%^g homo”. If this is indeed true, I wonder who leaked this to the media….

Arguably, questioning someone’s parentage, making a statement about someone’s sexual proclivities, referring to someone’s parent’s anatomy or attributing incestuous tendencies to someone are in the same league. Ergo because Hogg or Symonds did not transgress the line of decency, neither did Harbhajan! Unless one accepts that different standards of acceptable behaviour are being used.

Did someone just say cricket is a gentleman’s game? Oh my! Such ignorance- either about the game’s modern version or the meaning of the word “gentleman”.

PPS: After all this row about bad umpiring, not playing in the spirit of the game, cheating, and the Aussies wanting to win at any cost, please let us not forget that we lost 3 wickets in one over. Or that if Jaffer or Yuvraj (both of whom have had a forgettable tour so far) had each played 3 more deliveries each, we may still have saved the match.

Entry Filed under: Cricket. Tags: , , , , , .

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. withmalice  |  January 14, 2008 at 2:04 am

    Explain to me why this has only just been introduced, and not at the initial inquiry where South African Mike Procter judged Harbhajan to be guilty?
    Just another of the incongruities in the Indian cricket team’s stance on this.
    - Tendulkar didn’t say that he didn’t say ‘monkey’, he said he didn’t say anything!
    - The Indian team claim that Symonds broke an agreement he made in a meeting with Harbhajan post the Mumbai incident… a meeting Harbhajan denies ever occurred!

    The latest ‘no,-I-said-your-mother’s-a-[expletive deleted]‘ defense is a pathetic attempt at misdirection.

    Reply
  • 2. anandkrishna  |  January 14, 2008 at 7:58 am

    As far as I recall, Sachin only said that Harbhajan did not say anything “racist”. Maybe he is too much of a gentleman to quote what Harbhajan actually said….. but now that it’s all in the open, oh well….

    And why the Indian team did not raise this at the initial hearing, I have no clue. I think even the Brad Hogg issue should have been raised that day, and not as an after-thought, which leaves them open to criticism of it being a complaint in revenge.

    Thanks for the non-Indian perspective- not sure though, if you are Australian (though I suspect you are).

    Reply
  • 3. Bharat Sundaram  |  January 14, 2008 at 9:42 am

    Personally, I believe even W.G Grace (beard et.al) would have mouthed his share of expletives from club grounds to the haloed Lords pavilion.

    Pity that the video camera started covering cricket so late into the 1900s; the stump phone followed much later! Otherwise, like in law-enforecement, the match referee would have a complete anthology of expletives to fall back on.

    The ICC could then release a separate codebook meting out sentences for each and every expletive in the hypothetical anthology :P

    There is not much to be derived from dwelling on the expletive exchange issue. The fact of the matter is simple: The Aussies need partisan issues to divert attention away from their pathetic outlook towards cricket; like for instance, claiming grounded catches.

    Reply
  • 4. withmalice  |  January 14, 2008 at 10:04 pm

    No problem anandkrishna! ;)

    @ Bharat – err… huh? Misdirection definitely occurred, but it’s arguable that it’s shifting emphasis off racial abuse & blatant time-wasting.

    ‘Grounded catches’? What, Clarke’s? You obviously didn’t watch the match, because two of three camera angles show that it was indeed, a catch. Perhaps in addition to exploring stuff like that, you could explore the way the teams have behaved post match…

    Reply
  • 5. withmalice  |  January 14, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    Note, Kumble’s dropping the Hogg incident was a very magnanimous gesture…
    I hope the two teams can move on from this.

    Reply
  • 6. Aravind  |  January 29, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    Guys,
    Teri m**ki is something that almost every indian cricketer or for that matter any indian sportsman use as a matter of fact. In fact I have heard this very clearly from Manoj Prabhakar,Yuvraj etc….So do westerners when using bastards… While bastards is a big deal ..and monkey very mild. I’m sure Bhajji would have used Teri m**ki and not monkey….They aussies heard and misunderstood that… We should just laugh at it leave it at that….
    \aravind

    Reply
  • 7. VM  |  January 31, 2008 at 5:03 am

    Okay, so what does “teri maa ki” mean, pray tell?

    Reply
  • 8. Yasir Hasan  |  February 27, 2008 at 5:14 pm

    @VM
    Teri Maa Ki mean Your Mom’s ****

    Teri –> Your
    Maa Ki –) Mom’s

    now the end of this abuse usually is C**t…let me tell you man, in our culture it is though common but way harsher than a monkey…

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Categories

 

January 2008
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Recent Posts

Archives

Recent Comments

anandkrishna on Tiger Woods delivers high…
JimmyBean on India in danger of exiting Cha…
hemant dave on About
anandkrishna on The proposed reforms to Std X …
Alok Parande on The proposed reforms to Std X …

Blog Stats

Top Posts